An ecological disaster that happened in Tennessee on December of 2008 may have doomed a local business that employs 250 people. After heavy rains overloaded the system, residences living near the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Kingston coal plant were flooded with approximately 500 million gallons of black coal waste. It covered 400 acres of land and flooded into tributaries of the Tennessee River which is the water supply for Chattanooga TN and millions of people living downstream in Alabama, Tennessee and Kentucky.
It lead many environmental groups to push the EPA into declaring coal ash (the solid material left over after burning coal) as a hazardous, toxic waste, and forced the EPA to enforce the Clean Water Act more stringently. A little known fact up to that point was that Ludington's SS Badger, the last coal-powered ship on the Great Lakes, dumped a coal ash slurry into the lake as it crossed. The EPA said they had to stop that practice. Last year, the company managed to push the date for compliance up to December 2012.
The SS Badger has two basic options if they wish to survive after this date: they can find some alternative to burning coal as a fuel or find an alternative method of getting rid of their coal ash.
At the July 12, 2010 Ludington City Council meeting, it was divulged that the Lake Michigan Carferry had requested the city's assistance in applying for federal funding to convert the vessel's coal-fired propulsion system to an EPA-approved diesel system. The total cost would be $16 million, $14 million to come from the grant, with the city as the fiduciary.
Many of you may remember that when the high-speed Diesel ferry that travels between Muskegon-Milwaukee asked for $14.5 million of guaranteed loans from the government back in 2004 to start up operations there was (rightly) indignation by the Lake Michigan Carferry (LMC), owner of the SS Badger, over the unfairness of it all, since Charles Conrad had used only his personal funds to reinvigorate the SS Badger. Why now does the LMC decide to put the taxpayer's money at risk to fund changing a national historic landmark from a romantic, nostalgic coal-fired steam ship to just another annoying Diesel boat?
I think Charles Conrad must be rolling over in his grave at such a notion. But I do believe the EPA has a point-- the LMC should not be dumping coal ash slurry into the lake, whether it is a hazardous material or not, and should have been either dumping this coal ash in a lined landfill all along, or finding a way to recycle it (coal ash recycling into building materials has been a lucrative business where it has been tried).
If the LMC does get this grant, does switch over to Diesel, it will have lost its soul, and will likely find a bunch of patrons that will navigate elsewhere. My advice to LMC Chairman Manglitz: Quit dumping this stuff in our lake, and start getting rid of it responsibly and in accordance with the Clean Water Act. If you want Diesel, fund it without taxpayer funds.
Tags:
© 2024 Created by XLFD. Powered by