Started this discussion. Last reply by Mary A. Oct 9, 2010. 13 Replies 0 Likes
i heard this story on the tv and couldnt beleive what i heard. i then went to the youtoob video and saw the same thing. look at the brief spot on here and then comment on what you think should have…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by charlemagnetism Oct 19, 2010. 7 Replies 0 Likes
at 3;30 we may verily find which of our michigan teams are overrated. talented spartans go for 3 in a row. raw talent qb robinson leads the wolverines to avenge the last 2 years of futility. who…Continue
Started this discussion. Last reply by Edie Lindsey Oct 2, 2010. 11 Replies 0 Likes
in early august i applied at ludington talks to join there place. i like to discuss stuff. waiting. waiting. last night 50 days later i gave up there and joined here. from what ive read i think…Continue
charlemagnetism has not received any gifts yet
© 2024 Created by XLFD. Powered by
Comment Wall (5 comments)
You need to be a member of The Ludington Torch to add comments!
Join The Ludington Torch
Good Day,
How is everything with you, I picked interest on you after going through your short profile and deemed it necessary to write you immediately. I have something very vital to disclose to you, but I found it difficult to express myself here, since it's a public site.Could you please get back to me on:( mr.frankkwabena0044@yahoo.com.hk ) for the full details.
Have a nice day
Thanks God bless.
Mr.Frank
Should certain public records be allowed to be hidden from public view and deliberately withheld from public discussion? A well known judge recently professed on public television that most criminal convictions are public information except to protect certain innocent victims and minors. But what about the guilty? What GOOD is the Freedom of Information Act when certain individuals are allowed to HIDE their own illegal activity?