Bullies in Ludington Blue

[XLFD]

Preliminary Investigation:  Salt and Spice and Everything Not Nice

 

The April 7, 2012 issue of the Ludington Daily News had an interesting article on the sale of items at two local establishments, one that just so happens to be in Downtown Ludington.  The business, which was never mentioned, received a letter from Barnett on April 4 about 'spice' and 'bath salts'.  This is not cinnamon and the latest from Calgon.  Spice is an incense that produces a narcotic effect, and the bath salts that have similar effects, when not used as directed.  Both are legal, and both are labelled "not for human consumption".

 

The article says: 

1)  "Unfortunately, the product’s use has also increased traffic at another local business: Memorial Medical Center. Medical officials have observed several people having bad experiences with the drug."

2)  "The letter spells out the civil penalties the store owners could face if customers under the influence of something purchased at their stores have either medical or legal issues."

3)  "The Ludington business has instructed people how to smoke the substance, even though it’s labeled not for human consumption, according to Barnett."

4)  "Barnett said the substance is currently legal but he would like to see it disappear from the community.  “Maybe someone would have to go someplace else to get their spice,” Barnett said. “That would be OK by me.”"

5)  "The mother of a Ludington man who used one of the products contacted the Ludington Daily News early this year to report that he had been hospitalized and was undergoing mental health treatment after just one use of a bath salt that was purchased in the area."

And many other quotes from officials without the use of too many specifics.  It looked to me as if Chief Barnett had an objective, and like most of his objectives, he wasn't too discriminating in the attainment of them, using the LDN as a tool, much like most local government officials do.  That was my hypothesis.

 

Information Development:  FOIA Coordinating Time

 

The letter and other statements by public officials were available through the power of the FOIA, and so I sent two out to Ludington and the Mason County Prosecutor.  Referencing the article, I asked John Shay, Ludington FOIA Coordinator for:

"1) the letter LPD Chief Mark Barnett sent to a Ludington-area store on Wednesday 4-4-2012 about the potential civil penalties, etc. of dealing these substances
2) any police reports, statements, memos, etc. allegedly showing that the Ludington-based business has instructed people on how to smoke the substance even though its labeled "not for human consumption".

By all means, edit out any material that may be exempt due to privacy or other law enforcement exemptions, but please note the reasons why if it is not entirely obvious."

 

I received the letter and a police report, and the only exempt material was private information on the police report.  My FOIA request to the prosecutor (shown fully here) asked for:

I received two E-mails between the prosecutor and Chief Barnett.

 

The Evidentiary Material

  A.  The E-mails Between the Officials

 

I thought this E-mail was promising, and it looked as if Chief Barnett may be engaged in a service that is to be commended, educating the public about the dangers of these designer drugs.  His intent seemed honorable.  Prosecutor Paul Spaniola's reply looked well-meaning as well:

Missing in the Prosecutor's remarks were the FOIA-requested precedents and references that he used to draft his response.  Absent was also any hint of any such type of problem in Mason County that he was aware of. 

 

B.  The Letter and the Police Report

 

The letter was drafted to Mr. Garth Lemere of the AGS Store and hand delivered to him by the Chief and his faithful Captain Michael Harrie (as stated in the police report.  The letter reads thusly:

 

 

 

The following incident report 12-001362 was written up detailing the actions took by law enforcement that day between 11:05 AM and 11:15 AM.

This was the full extent of the FOIA response, and the reader will once again notice the lack of any other police report detailing any incident beyond the LPD's contact with these store owners who just moved downtown within the last year.

 

Analysis

 

The prosecutor's material illustrated that Chief Barnett's concerns were commendable and done with the best intentions.  But I was somewhat confused by the police report and the letter.  The "staff member" seems to refer to a member of the District 10 Health Dept  which covers ten counties in West Michigan.  Not to any "staff member" at the AGS Store, who are referred to as salespeople in the report. 

With that information they go to a store that sells materials that could be used in an unhealthful way.  There is no indication that it has been used in such a way, from previous incidents, nor do the substances fall in the illegal category.  They hand the letter to the owner who reads it. 

The letter states that the AGS store staff has gave advice on how to smoke it, but there is no evidence of that, as there were no further records in the possession of LPD that indicated such (as they were not included in the FOIA response or exempted by the FOIA Coordinator).  As such, it is hearsay information and should have been documented thusly.  I sensed the letter also strayed from the purely informative and educational aspect Barnett originally envisioned into being a bit accusatory and intimidatory to the business.  I admire Mr. Lemere's noncommittal reaction to this strange event.

What really struck me as prejudicial in the report, however was the last line:  "Investigation may be re-opened if further illegal activiity occurs".  This effectively states that some illegal activity has already occurred, but even if a salesperson had given advice, the illegality of doing so is suspect, as that would be protected speech. 

 

Crime Victim Notification

 

The AGS Store is the victim here.  They have been accused of doing illegal activity and of having their staff giving advice on how to smoke incense, when such activity has not been documented or legitimately investigated and sanctioned.  The LDN article was spoon-fed to that paper by the Chief and contained inaccuracies, prejudicial material, and half-truths. 

Does Chief Barnett and Capt. Harrie visit other stores that sell turpentine, paint thinner, ammonia, etc. and other potentially-abused substances and allege those merchants have violated the law by doing so?  Is this a proper way to treat a new merchant who comes to the town and offers unique products?  Was the visit by Chief Barnett perhaps encouraged by a competitor who may view the AGS Store as a threat to their business?  Or by a group of businesses who don't like this new upstart and their downtown fit?

Or was the Chief's motivation due solely or primarily by a desire to remove a perceived threat to the quietude of his city?  Time and future events will tell, but I see threatening and intimidating behavior behind the actions.

 

[Smile]

Yes thru illegal terms!!! Do they threaten 15 other businesses downtown now..that is the question here...they must remove all alcohol, turpentine, paint thinner, hand sanitizer, and whip cream in the City limits sold, get rid of the threats and play on an even field!!! I guess the LPD, CM, Mayor DDA, have a busy schedule ahead of them don't they!!! We will see how they handle a fair playing field or NOT!!!! They do have favorites and make it very obvious by not doing any further actions on any further businesses with illegal threats..What's up cowards!!

[XLFD]

Looks like we may get spice and bath salts banned if Governor Snyder sign a bill that has reached his office:  http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/michigan/snyder-gets-bills-to-ban-sp...

The reasonable person inside me thinks that this will save some kids and foolish adults from these products.  And yet the even more reasonable person inside me is offended that the legislature wants to restrict what people purchase with their hard-earned dollars, and give our health departments more power to act unilaterally in doing so. 

[In Dulci Jubilo]

The mom in me says they should probably be outlawed  :-)