Mass. police: Bomb suspects didn't have gun permit

[Dave]

OMG! The Boston bombers didn't have legal guns or gun permits! I'm shocked!! You mean to tell me they had illegal weapons? Who would believe such craziness? I mean just think, if the background check that Obama and his supporters wanted had already been law, the Bombers still would of had the weapons and still killed people. And they wonder why people that support gun rights take issue with bills such as the one Obama wanted.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) — A Massachusetts police official say the brothers suspected of bombing the Boston Marathon before having shootouts with authorities didn't have gun permits.

Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas tells The Associated Press in an interview Sunday that neither Tamerlan Tsarnaev (tsahr-NEYE'-ehv) nor his brother Dzhokhar had permission to carry firearms.

He says it's unclear whether either ever applied and the applications aren't considered public records.

But he says the 19-year-old Dzhokhar (joh-KHAR') would have been denied a permit because of his age. Only people 21 or older are allowed gun licenses in Massachusetts.

The suspects were also accused of hijacking a Mercedes on Thursday night.

Haas says the pair didn't release the driver, but he escaped when he was left alone while the two men entered a convenience store.

http://bigstory.ap.org/article/mass-police-bomb-suspects-didnt-have...

[XLFD]

Let history show that at about the same time these shootouts were taking place, POTUS Obama gave a shrill speech about why congress was so wrong about not infringing on American's rights, while VPOTUS Biden cried.

 

[easymoney]

Isn't it amazing how ADMINISATION PROPAGANDA NEWS MEDIA,ie AP has got to bring up O's agenda on guns. We'll fit that narrative into every article we can. Not only didn't they not have a gun permit, they also broke the law of speeding while trying to out run the police.

Prove's the old saying If you outlaw guns, only outlaws will have guns.