The $1.9 Trillion American Rescue Plan (ARP) recently passed has its own share of parity in distribution to individuals and local governments in our area, but it has a noticeable degree of disparity between cities once you look beyond our area.
Individuals who file taxes and make under $75,000 per year ($150,000 if filing jointly with another) in 2019 or 2020 will qualify for $1400, but those earning over $80,000 ($160,000 jointly) will get naught. Others not filing taxes may qualify (details not yet released). If one presumes those making over $80,000 in both years didn't need an additional $1400, then it's harder to be fairer than giving the same amount to every person.
If 140 million people in the USA qualify (less amounts have qualified for prior stimulus checks in 2020), less than $200 billion will go to individuals, or about 10% of the ARP's payouts. A more significant amount will go to state governments and a comparable amount will go to local governments: counties, cities, townships.
The ARP money distributed to local county governments, Mason County and the three counties surrounding, it are as follows:
Mason County: $5.65 million (population: 28,954)
Oceana County: $5.13 million (26,416)
Manistee County: $4.76 million (24,457)
Lake County: $2.30 million (11,852)
If county distributions are based mostly on the county's population, one can infer that local counties get roughly $200 per resident. This seems to be a fair distribution. When one looks at city and township governments, a similar parity seems to arise based on their populations when one adds the total allotments for each local government:
MASON COUNTY (Total Twps + Cities: $2,880,000)
Ludington City: $800,000
Scottville City: $120,000
Hamlin Twp: $340,000
Amber Twp: $260,000
PM Twp: $240,000
Victory Twp: $140,000
Branch Twp: $130,000
Custer Twp: $130,000
Riverton Twp: $120,000
Sherman Twp: $120,000
Sheridan Twp: $110,000
Summit Twp: $ 90,000
Grant Twp: $ 90,000
Freesoil Twp: $ 80,000
Eden Twp: $ 60,000
Logan Twp: $ 30,000
Meade Twp: $ 20,000
MANISTEE COUNTY (Total Twps + Cities = $2,310,000)
Manistee City: $600,000
Manistee Twp: $400,000
Filer Twp: $230,000
Bear Lake Twp: $170,000
Norman Twp: $150,000
Onekama Twp: $130,000
Maple Grove Twp: $130,000
Dickson Twp: $100,000
Cleon Twp: $ 90,000
Springdale Twp: $ 80,000
Pleasanton Twp: $ 80,000
Stronach Twp: $ 80,000
Brown Twp: $ 70,000
Arcadia Twp: $ 60,000
Marilla Twp: $ 40,000
OCEANA COUNTY (Total Twps + Cities = $2,610,000)
Hart City: $200,000
Shelby Twp: $400,000
Grant Twp: $290,000
Newfield Twp: $230,000
Hart Twp: $180,000
Golden Twp: $170,000
Pentwater Twp: $150,000
Benona Twp: $140,000
Ferry Twp: $130,000
Weare Twp: $120,000
Greenwood Twp: $120,000
Elbridge Twp: $100,000
Leavitt Twp: $ 90,000
Otto Twp: $ 80,000
Claybanks Twp: $ 80,000
Crystal Twp: $ 80,000
Colfax Twp: $ 50,000
LAKE COUNTY: (Total Twps + Cities = $1,160,000)
Pleasant Plains Twp: $160,000
Webber Twp: $160,000
Chase Twp: $120,000
Elk Twp: $100,000
Lake Twp: $ 90,000
Yates Twp: $ 80,000
Ellsworth Twp: $ 80,000
Pinora Twp: $ 70,000
Newkirk Twp: $ 60,000
Peacock Twp: $ 50,000
Eden Twp: $ 50,000
Cherry Valley Twp: $ 40,000
Dover Twp: $ 40,000
Sauble Twp: $ 30,000
Sweetwater Twp: $ 30,000
Interestingly, those totals are roughly equal to $100 per person when one considers the total population of each county. Thus, the local component in these four counties is fairly consistent, roughly $300 per person: $200 to the county government, $100 to the township/city one resides. Where is the disparity this humble author originally claimed.
A Tale of Twin Cities
St. Joseph and Benton Harbor are two communities that are adjacent, yet far apart. St. Joe has the advantage of abutting the Lake Michigan coast, having been founded a couple decades before Benton Harbor, with the St. Joseph River serving as boundary.
St. Joseph is comparable to Ludington in size at 8365 people, and their city government will get roughly $100 per person from the ARP ($820,000) just like Ludington and Scottville. Benton Harbor is just a little bigger at 9843 people, and what will they receive?
You might think they would get roughly $980,000, but for some reason, the city qualifies for about 11 times that amount: $10,630,000. Why is that?
Perhaps the city went past a population threshold that allows much greater rewards? No, consider Big Rapids; their population is 10,355, bigger than BH, but they will receive only $1,020,000, less than ten percent of what Benton Harbor will get. Big Rapids is approximately the same size as Muskegon Heights, another city that will get megafunded at $11,040,000, or almost 11 times the amount of Big Rapids. Rather than the city rate being at about $100 per person, the rate for the Heights and Harbor is over $1000 per person.
Why is there this disparity?
Could it be based on average incomes, where poorer cities/townships get a multiplier? Nope, consider that Lake County is the poorest county in Michigan, with Yates and Webber Townships (along with BH) being in the top four poorest communities in the state. Webber Twp gets $93 per resident from ARP, Yates Twp gets a $102 rate. Benton Harbor gets $1080 per resident.
Could it be based on race, as Benton Harbor has over 90% of its populations being African American? If so, then why does Highland Park, the absolute poorest community in Michigan with well over 90% of its population being African American and with 1000 more people than Benton Harbor, get only $1,060,000 in total, or $98 per person under the ARP?
Could it be based on Benton Harbor being considered a 'metropolitan city'? Benton Harbor and several other Michigan cities are listed in the special 'Metropolitan City' section as far as disbursements but the ARP clarifies that the definition of metropolitan cities includes all cities over 50,000 inhabitants. Among those, Livonia, a city of 93,655 people who will get $8,310,000, or $89 per resident.
It seems patently unfair that cities like Benton Harbor and Muskegon Heights are getting paid 10 to 11 times the amount per capita than cities like Ludington, Big Rapids, Highland Park, and Livonia in a somewhat arbitrary part of an otherwise mostly-fair redistribution plan. Why build such injustice into a government handout supposedly aimed to rescue those in direst need, and missing that target?
The data used in this article is from this Excel spreadsheet issued by the Senate Democrats.
Wow! That's a boat load of information X. I could never have read all of the information and put together such a well done article. Again, the Government has made a complicated mess out of this situation. A situation they caused, not the virus.
I think they created a smoke screen like magicians often do. While we are all concerned about which state, city or citizen gets what they are sneaking out the back door with most of the loot. It's not who get's what, it's who pay's what. This isn't manna from heaven. The bill for this will come due soon enough and may be the wave over the bow that sinks us. I'm afraid we have had our clothes stolen while we worried about the color of our socks.
I was originally just interested in the local allocations in the Excel spreadsheet, but my natural curiosity got the best of me and I explored further finding some communities that really hit paydirt, finding other needful communities that missed out.
Allocating $350,000,000,000 to state and local government appears to me as an admission that the federals are taking and making much more money than they should be, then inefficiently handing it back to the other governments, wiping away billions of dollars in the process' bureaucracy-- same as they do in the grant process.
Muskegon Heights has average revenues (and expenditures) that are more than Ludington's, but unlike Ludington, they will receive a stimulus amounting to 1.5 times of their normal annual budget rather than 1/8th of it. Meanwhile, qualifying MH citizens will get the equivalent of less than one month's work at minimum wage.
Both the City of Muskegon (https://www.hud.gov/states/michigan/community/partnerwebsites) and the City of Benton Harbor (https://bhcity.us/community-economic-development/) are "Entitlement Communities" as defined by the Department of Housing and Urban Development meaning that they receive direct allocations from HUD each year. In this stimulus package, it seems as though they are utilizing a per capita amount plus additional allocations for those folks who already have direct funding from the Federal Government.
Thanks for trying to explain the disparity, but the entitlement community label falls far short. First off, the City of Muskegon (at $659 per capita) is distinct from the City of Muskegon Heights, one of the communities that got the mega boost and is not an EC. Second, Livonia is on the EC list, yet only gets $89 a person. Back in 2010, the ACS reported an average household income in Livonia over twice the average household income in Ludington, but Livonia is the entitlement community...
Apologies. Muskegon Heights is an Entitlement Community as well.
I would agree that at first review in this "stimulus" it seems as though the allocations for the City/State payments are swerved in certain directions versus being a more equal distribution. It is unfortunate that there was so much pork or silly spending that went into a bill that should've focused on the needs of people dealing with the affects of so many negative affects of COVID (forced shutdowns, lost wages/employment, reduced revenues).
Amen. It's too bad the few rational people left in government and mainstream media cannot point out that those $1400 checks people clamor for come at a much more expensive cost to them and their posterity over time. Instead you only hear from those officials and 'journalists' that would have you max out your credit cards and ignore your monthly statements until the repo man eventually comes.
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship." -- Alexander Fraser Tytler
Thanks for that additional context, I wholeheartedly agree. It is the rare exception when an official defies becoming an automatic aristocrat when they get elected to an office; naturally, their appointees and staff will also follow that trend leading to a growing gulf between the government and their constituents.
Treasure the few Rand and Ron Pauls, the Ronald Reagans, and even the Donald Trumps in this world who accept the premise that they are public servants, not that the public are their servants. The doddering fool in the White House now told a union worker in this very state less than a year ago: "I’m not working for you. Give me a break, man. Don’t be such a horse’s ass." These types will act like monarchs, but they are just aged caterpillars.