In one of the sillier stories i've read of late, NOW is suing Hooters because they offer a childrens menu as well as having high chairs and bib's that say "future hooters girl". Apparently NOW hasn't gotten the memo that they are no longer relevant in the grand scheme of things. Whatever credibility they had was shot during the California governors race where there was a woman running for governor and was called a whore by someone in the opposing campaign and still NOW supported the male running. Anyway, NOW needs to grow up and stop wasting their supporters money on stupid lawsuits.
Our love of Hooters girls is well documented, but alas, not even the siren song of wings can convince the National Organization for Women.
They seem to think bibs that say "Future Hooters Girl" are somehow bad for children.
The women's rights org filed complaints against the restaurant chain for
catering to kids despite the fact that the establishments located in
San Francisco, San Bruno, Sacramento and Orange County are classified as
"adult entertainment" places.
Hooters also has children's menus, high chairs and booster seats, which would be available at family-friendly restaurants, the San Francisco Chronicle
reported. And promoting itself as a "family-style" eatery violates
state and local laws that prohibit sexually oriented adult businesses
from serving minors.
While Hooters reveals
that "10 percent of the parties we serve have children in them," it also
says that the restaurant doesn't promote themselves to families but
serve "all customers, including children."
Even though NOW does have a point, what if these kids just love bleu cheese?
Tags:
This last year, I ate at a Hooter's, down near Chicago for the first time, when I was invited by a lady to eat there. It has some overpriced food, but the ambiance of pretty women and sports themes deflect your attention away from that. The outfits are well within community standards of decency, as noted by others.
The restaurant obviously caters to the masculine with their focus on sports and attractive women in the trademark outfit, which really is nothing very different than what Richard Simmons wears while exercising.
I think I would lose a bit of my appetite though, if Mr. Simmons was my waiter. I see nothing wrong with a young girl baby wearing a bib that says "Future Hooter's Girl" anymore than I see anything wrong with a young boy baby wearing a bib that says "Future Chippendale's Dancer".
Our society, which seems to be having an epidemic of obesity among its youths, and should promote more the concepts of sports and healthy bodies. If they're seeking a healthy diet, they may need to look beyond the Hooter's main menu, however. NOW is, and has been irrelevant since the Clinton Administration exposed their hypocrisy.
I had to check this out. Here's a link:
http://www.ktvu.com/news/26169285/detail.html
The news video makes it look to me that this is just the overhyped workings of a frustrated NAG regional president. Is this what the biggest problem is in the San Francisco area? Some libbies think so. I never ate at a Hooters but this story makes me want to go there with the family.
© 2024 Created by XLFD. Powered by