Wonder why it is stated that the girl that drowned was a victim?   Was a crime involved?  

Normally if it was a accident it would have stated casualty.

Views: 193

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The Lake can be a brutal crook, a thief, a burglar, and take advantage of one's life. Very sad for the local young girl and condolences to her family and friends.

It emphasizes what our parents, grandparents and great great grandparents for generations have emphasized to us even without the help of NWS and social media warnings. Somehow it seems the older generation learned to respect the winds and could perceive the attitude of the Lake by its whitecaps and undertow. Casualty or victim, it is sad.

Whether our community should have done more and provide patrol or close the beach like Holland did, is in the hands of those in charge, and at the voice of the people to demand.

I had a long conversation about this on our Facebook interface, The Ludington Pitchfork.  The problem arose when the COLDNews reported shortly after they found Ms. Huck (and this is still available):

"A female victim was found in the waters of Lake Michigan around 10 p.m. Thursday night north of Stearns Park Beach in Ludington.
Ludington Police Chief Mark Barnett said a the female victim was transported by ambulance to Spectrum Health Ludington Hospital. A teenager was reported to have went missing near the beach earlier in the night, but Barnett would not confirm the identity of the victim.
Ludington police notified the public of a missing teenage girl, Albrianna Huck, 14. The department reported that Huck went missing at 7:40 p.m. Thursday, wearing a bathing suit."

Emphasis added.  To me, when an official calls somebody a victim without modifying it (such as by saying 'drowning victim'), it signals that there was some crime committed; it also suggested that they were found in a non-revivable state.  Black's Law Dictionary defines 'victim' simply as  "Person harmed by criminal acts, attack target."  So when Barnett originally would not identify the girl found and inferred it was a 'victim', I and others were confused, and thought there could have been a second person, perhaps somebody looking for Ms. Huck.  By simply saying that the girl found matched the description of the missing girl and that search efforts had been called off, the chief could have saved the public from that confusion.  Or maybe the COLDNews anonymous reporter flubbed the information.  

But the COLDNews next story related quotes from the chief using the word 'victim' exclusively:  

"Upon their arrival, Barnett stated they met individuals that located the victim in the water and had started CPR. Searchers and first responders continued CPR on the victim while she was being transported to the Loomis Street Boat Launch via a coast guard boat and then to the hospital via Life EMS. First responders continued to assist emergency department personnel in providing CPR in an effort to revive Huck.  The family of the victim was directed to the hospital, and they were assisted by the Mason County Victim's Assistance Unit, Barnett stated."

The MCP quotes Barnett using that term throughout his press conference.  The emergency workers did their job, but I hope if there's anything to learn from this (other than that the lifeguard program may be worthwhile) it's that the LPD must do a better job of informing and communicating with the public during an emergency.  This was as bad as the sheriff's office usually does, and that's an embarrassment.


© 2022   Created by XLFD.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service