Sometimes one person can defeat a city's ingrained culture of corruption if they face it with enough perseverance and willpower.  A small southeastern Michigan city has that person in Reese Scripture, a heroic woman who used the courts and the democratic process to root out malfeasance in her home town.  The journey of her courageous saga is told with rare journalistic integrity by Crystal Proxmire and illustrates how citizens can take back their city when its leadership has become morally lost.

Clawson Settles Lawsuit, Makes Steps Towards More Transparency
(Crystal A. Proxmire, Feb. 9, 2020)

Clawson, MI – Transparency might seem like a simple thing, but making it happen at a local government level takes hard conversations, trials and errors, changes in habits and culture, and sometimes even a lawsuit. Clawson, a town of just under 12,000 that dubs itself “the little city with the big heart,” is in the midst of such changes.

Recently elected Mayor Reese Scripture (pictured) has been leading the charge for change. Prior to running for Mayor she filed a lawsuit against the city for Open Meetings Act (OMA) violations, centered mainly on the departure of former City Manager Mark Pollock as well as a variety of topics that were discussed inappropriately in closed session.

With the lawsuit still in the court system, Scripture won the election against Mayor Deb Wooley with 61.33% of the votes. Kathy Phillips and Louis Sampson also were voted in. Phillips previously had served eight years on the council.

They, along with council members Susan Moffit and Mayor Pro Tem Paula Millan, are navigating both administrative changes and the process of setting policies to avoid the problems of the past.

An example arose even in her first meeting as Mayor of Clawson, when Reese Scripture found herself in a tough position as she and council were tasked with appointing the Mayor Pro Tem. Historically, the position was filled, as outlined in the City Charter, by a secret ballot vote.

Scripture, at the time still in the midst of a lawsuit against the city over Open Meetings Act violations by the previous administration, thought (correctly) that the procedure was wrong. Yet the City Attorney insisted, stating that the secret ballot had been used the year before.

After the meeting, Scripture found the appropriate law, and had the appointment process redone in a public way at the next meeting.

Scripture found it to be a “learning moment,” and a chance to demonstrate that as areas come up where more transparency is needed, she and others on council can make changes and do things right.

“Our local government is made of people, and people make mistakes. The difference is that when you know better, you fix what was wrong and you do better moving forward.”

Scripture says she’s not a person with political aspirations, but a resident who saw problems and felt called to help correct them. After filing the lawsuit, she felt the City still was not responding. So she ran for Mayor in the Nov. 2019 election.

Scripture’s lawsuit, filed in Jan. of 2019, outlined a pattern of alleged OMA violations, including…..

~A closed session under “attorney/client privilege” where there was no attorney or legal opinions present.
~Closed sessions with topics that should have been discussed in public such as planning department restructuring, operational activities and goals for city departments, promotion of recycling, staff training, informational materials for residents, and road maintenance.
~ A March 12, 2018 meeting was held “purportedly for the purposed of evaluating the City Manager/Finance Director.” Later in the year other meetings would be held regarding the City Manager, Mark Pollack, and at the Nov. 20 city council meeting, the council approved a separation agreement.
~ On May 22, an “informational study session workshop” was held to discuss replacing the City Planner. “On information and belief, council deliberately scheduled this meeting to conflict with the Planning Commission’s regularly-scheduled meeting in order to avoid any challenge or input from the Planning Commissioners,” the lawsuit states.
~At the June 5 meeting, council went into closed session and made a decision on the new city planner. At June 19’s regularly scheduled council meeting the new planner was introduced even before members voted to approve their contract. Scripture soon after submitted a FOIA regarding the process, and the City then decided to set up an RFP for planning services.

After the suit was already filed, Scripture also learned that the former mayor had instructed the City Manager to hire a digital detective to do an audit on the City’s email system after city emails made their way onto social media. The City Manager at the time was Erin Irwin, who was hired after Pollock and has since resigned. Irwin said Mayor Wooley had come to him with orders to hire the firm and spend up to $5,000, but not to tell anybody about it. The audit did not find any evidence of hacking or inappropriate access.

The lawsuit was settled soon after she took office, with the City of Clawson paying $18,000 in attorney fees and agreeing to several changes, including:

~Creating a set of standardized policies and procedures for new and returning council members.
~Orientation to how city government operates, introduction to actual city departments and staff, and essential city functions.
~Requirement that new and returning council members attend training through Michigan Municipal League or equivalent, including the requirements of the OMA, FOIA, and other applicable statutes.
~Establish a line item in the budget for training.
~Create ethics ordinance and whistleblower policy.

“It always made me sad to take the extreme step of filing a lawsuit against my own city, Scripture said. "I was ignored when I pointed out the rules of the Open Meetings Act were being violated and ignored when I expressed concerns on some acts of questionable ethics, so I felt I had no choice but to take that next step. But, with the changes to Council brought by the election, along with the resignation of the former City Attorney, I think all parties agreed, the best thing for the City was to end the suit.

“The rules under which public bodies operate can be confusing and take effort to learn – and well-intentioned people will make mistakes. That is why everything I asked for revolved around mandatory council training and adopting robust ethical policies so we all understand our role under the charter, the rules under which public bodies operate, and incorporating an expectation of high ethical standards into our ordinances and policies. Not just for the current council but future elected and appointed officials.”

The beginnings of those requirements are now coming to fruition. Last week City Council met to discuss the ethics ordinance and whistleblower policy, which will be presented at an upcoming regular council meeting after being reviewed by the city attorney.

The City will also be hosting training for council members and those on boards and commissions regarding the OMA and FOIA later this month.

Moving forward, the mayor and fellow council members are looking at how to bring more residents into the decision making process.

“Clawson has never built a framework for high level community engagement,” Scripture said.


“Citizen advisory groups are a tool for community engagement and they are common in many municipalities. They are a great way to get more done and help inform Council in governance decisions. Getting that framework in place is one of my personal goals, and I hope I can get support from other council members and staff.

“We have a lot of smart people in this town with a healthy variety of perspectives. I’d love to see the first citizen advisory group be dedicated to looking at ways Clawson can promote sustainability ad resilience wherever feasible,” she said. Another possibility is a Youth Advisory Council, an effort that has been led by Clawson resident Lisa Ball, who has put together a proposal for council to consider.

“Our future should be driven by the our residents and people who have invested in Clawson, so it only makes sense to find more ways to involve them in mapping that future,” Scripture said.

Views: 469

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Good story, XLFD. Maybe some open-minded journalist will be writing a similar article about you someday!

Unfortunately, the news media around these parts are called the City of Ludington Daily News (COLDNews) for a good reason.  Then there's always MCP's Scottville City Commissioner Rob "see, hear, speak no city evil" Alway who has lost all journalistic integrity along the way.  

Her story actually reminded me of another local resident of Ludington who has spearheaded a campaign to get some accountability and transparency in Ludington City Hall:  Dianne Seelhoff.  The Open Meetings Act (OMA) lawsuit that was recently settled in November (or was it December?) by the city council was propelled primarily by her will and force of good character. 

Over a decade of experience with Ludington officials had me believing that there was only so much that could be achieved with a lawsuit effectively centering on the City's misuse of committee meetings to avoid public scrutiny of various issues, but she thought otherwise, and effectively everybody won (except the remnants of the corrupt elements of the City) with the settlement's provisions fought for by this municipal patriot in the local court for a period of two years.

Always Letter about conflict of Interest He seems to have forgotten what he said for the betterment of the city..  

Alway resigns from planning commission

February 18, 2013

By Rob Alway, Editor-in-Chief.

Editor’s note: I do not make it a habit to become part of a story. I personally do not think it is ethical for journalists to do so. However, in this particular case it is necessary. Here’s why:

SCOTTVILLE — At tonight’s Scottville City Commission meeting, the commissioners will be accepting my letter of resignation as a member of the planning commisison. Writing this article is a perfect example of one of the main reasons why I have chosen to resign from the Scottville Planning Commission. Over the past 14 months as the Mason County Press has grown it has become quite clear that serving on a government board is a conflict of interest.

I joined the planning commission in 2010 with the desire to help make a difference in the town that I live in. I believe it is important for every citizen to be involved in their community in some way. We live in a democracy which means government for the people, by the people. During the January meeting, I reluctantly accepted the chairmanship.

After tossing this around for months, I have concluded that my involvement in my community must be through Mason County Press rather than on the planning commission. This became most evident last October when I reported on an accident in which Mayor Joe Baxter drove his vehicle off a ravine. Since that time, the mayor has been charged with driving while under the influence of alcohol. His blood alcohol content measured .08 two hours after the accident. He has chosen to fight the charges against him.

The mayor has cornered me three separate times after various meetings and has told me, in so many words, that I have blown the story out of proportion and that I have saturated it. Anyone else, he said, it would be a quick blurb and then MCP, and the other local media, would move on. I have also been told by the mayor that my reporting on his incident does not give a positive light on the city.

That, I will agree with. The incident did not portray the city in a positive light. Scottville, once a vibrant small town, has had a rough couple of decades. I have chosen to live in this town because of my heritage and a certain level of pride, despite the town’s hard times. Why would I purposely portray our town in a bad light?

As a journalist I would not do justice to my readers and the general public to withhold a story just so it didn’t give the town a black eye. The fact is, the event happened. At no time has this news site ever made an accusation. Instead it has only reported the information available, which is the evidence presented by the Michigan State Police in its crash report along with statements from the prosecutor. Mayor Baxter has refused to comment on the record and therefore his side of the story cannot be presented.

With all that said, those are the two reasons why I have resigned from the Scottville Planning Commission. At no time should I, or any other journalist, make themselves part of the story. I have inadvertently done this through my involvement and I now I will digress.

The Scottville City Commission meets this afternoon at 5:30 p.m. Lisa Enos will be there reporting for MCP.

When he discretely rejoined the Scottville PC later, it didn't merit a story explaining why his opinion had changed, nor did he respect the line between news and self-serving propaganda thereafter; I've reported on that a couple of times.  It's a shame really, he has more talent than anybody currently on the COLDNews. 

Very interesting and beneficial type of story that should be read by our local Ludington Council and Mayor today. The parallels are very similar in many ways, and I applaud and deeply appreciate Mayor Scripture for her transparency and efforts to make Clawson a much better town in which residents can be proud and help their own future for progress and integrity.

Her intentions may be good as are many of her ideas but I do not agree with the "mandatory" requirements that the Councils must do in order to represent the people who supported and voted for them. If the suggestions are voluntary then that would be different. Most people think it's a good idea for people to know how government works but that should have been learned in school. The "learning process" should be made available to the council but not be forced upon them. What's next, forcing citizens to be trained in how to vote?

I can see where you are coming from, but I sincerely disagree.  This training and orientation among her reforms are essential ones, and you don't have to look anywhere but our own council for illustrating that problem.  This was part of the settlement we recently came to with the COL, because it was clear from the councilors (and other officials) conduct in committee meetings that they either were clueless or complicit in violating many tenets of the Open Meetings Act and other rules.  

If councilors and officials are trained, then one can show that their actions at unlawful meetings or correspondence were not done out of ignorance of the law, but because they intentionally wanted to skirt the law.  In the many times I have appealed a FOIA response, I have yet to see any councilor make a reasoned statement in their role as 'judge'.  There are supposedly no 'dumb' questions, but I have seen a ton of questions directed to the city manager and attorney over the years from seasoned councilors whom should have known the answers by dint of their occupation well before that.   

You wouldn't want your own attorney or your own doctor to be untrained, why would you want your politicians to be untrained and acting in ignorance?  Case in point:  at Monday's meeting I asked for a show of hands of all councilors who looked through the three rental rehab applications.  Nobody raised their hands, no councilor had any idea of their location (eventually given) or who owned the properties, however, they all voted for $720,000 to be given away in their ignorance.  Now they are all complicit in what amounts to fraud.  Training won't cure the stupidity and laziness it takes to vote for issues blindly, but it could actually help those councilors who want to do their jobs professionally.  As Councilor Serna would say:  "Just do your job."

I agree with X on this issue of training too. It's far more reasonable and beneficial for the council stooges to begin to understand their responsibilities by training, than it is to continue into the future with ignorance and arrogance as usual. As far as school learning, in the far past many things were taught, nowadays, I've heard and seen kids that have no idea of the issues and history whatsoever. It's just not taught much now, inept lazy teachers doing a half-ass job at best, programmed by new standards of learning and text books.

I don't disagree to often with you X but on this I do. The Council's actions in the past have not been from ignorance of the law. It was from corruption, plane and simple. All they had to do is a little legal research or even ask the thousand dollars a week city attorney they hired. No, it was not from ignorance. How many times did you have to file a FOIA case against the City. That alone proves all of this hoopla was not from ignorance. If an elected city official does not want to know the laws then they should be voted out or not voted in at all. If they are corrupt they should be prosecuted. A requirement of mandatory study of the law is not the answer. That will only keep many others from seeking the job. Making sure things are on the up and up and are done legally is the City attorney's job and if he/she fails to execute that job then they must go. No mandatory restrictions other than being a legal resident and citizens should be a prerequisite for holding the office if the voters and taxpayers approve their elections. I can see something like the mandatory requirements getting out of hand and become so restrictive that many ordinary people could not qualify to be a representative in government. I say leave it well enough alone. Honest people will have no problem learning and following the laws. It's the corrupt that are the problem not those who are honest and trust worthy.

I can see your points Willy, but there's a lot more to this imho. Both the courts and law enforcement agree that ignorance of the laws while breaking them is no excuse for doing so. This just doesn't seem to be the case with politicians nowadays, so getting them that training seems to be in the interest of all. And I also agree with the City Attorney giving them the accurate and truthful advice to guide them in the process. With Richard Wilson, that guidance was warped and convoluted over and over again, just to achieve the end result, not follow legalities in full. As for voting or kicking them out, again, the recall process is very difficult and lengthy to get accomplished, and the best kind of replacements aren't interested in dirty politics to pursue. I think Mayor Scripture is following a new path of excellence in Clawson that should be copied at many other levels of government, and surely Ludington could positively gain in every respect by her example.

Good points Aquaman. The question I raise is the mandatory requirement she insists on. If a duly elected official does not wish to participate are they then not allowed to represent the people who elected them? How far would this legal indoctrination go?  So, will it be a law for the mandatory education of law makers. There is nothing wrong with those in charge learning and knowing the law but as I said before this should be a voluntary process. Any time the Government starts mandating compliance to issues like this then where does it end. Will councilors be required to have a law degree? That may sound ridiculous but these are politicians who will be making the rules and the exclusion of ideas they do not agree with seems to be the pattern for much of their decisions. I would love to see highly educated people with a well rounded knowledge of the law but then the problem of political bias comes into question. And many citizens would be excluded from holding office if that scenario was established. Would Trump have qualified  if these standards had been in affect. It seems that those trying to force him out of office didn't seem to mind breaking the rules.  There are more than enough rules and regulations now.

I better understand your points now, Willy, I'm not a big fan of mandates myself in most cases.  Yet, this is one case where I am.  The new rules do not require any new restrictions on who can become a councilor, it just requires training on issues that come up in their job all of the time.  It's equivalent to getting a job as a general laborer and not qualifying as competent for other jobs within the shop without proper training. 

Everyone should want their representative at city hall to know the rules of open government, it makes it more likely to happen.  It also is a whole lot easier to show intentional violations when they occur.  In Ludington's case, if the records show everyone on the LCC has been trained thoroughly about the OMA, you can more easily show their corruption when their acts do not follow those rules. 

Courts rarely punish officials for intentional violations because they forgive ignorance of the law in that case.  It's stupid, but that's the reality.  If you can show that all members of the council were trained to know better, you have a much easier case to prove corruption when it exists and flourishes, as it has in the past.

RSS

© 2024   Created by XLFD.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service