*************** ZIMMERMAN TRIAL *****************
GZ Not Guilty Defense:
1. GZ Following TM = Not a Crime.
2. GZ Carrying Gun = Not a Crime.
3. Most reliable witness (i.e. closest, with best view) John Good, sees GZ ((screaming for help)) being ground & pounded by TM.
4. Professional Police investigators (trained to perceive deception and catch people in lies) said they “believed” GZ telling truth.
5. MMA “experience” (per instructor) = A “soft” person who didn’t even know how to throw punch.
6. GZ’s statements consistent (with “minor” variations). YES they are minor. Reaching for “or” touching gun creates exact same fear for someone being beaten.
7. GZ's testimony irt him screaming for help was "prior" to even knowing about 911 recording.
8. GZ’s immediate response to the proposition that TM’s phone may have caught the fight was…drum roll… “THANK GOD!!”
9. Jeantel’s testimony puts TM in vicinity of dad’s fiancées house. Then, “after” hearing TM say “he’s behind me”, Jeantel hears sounds of TM moving. This matches up with Bahadoor’s statement of hearing running from left to right (from fiancées house towards altercation site). Then, Jeantel hears TM say “what are you following me for”. Highly indicative that TM ran “towards” altercation site as “the aggressor”…
10. If in fear for your life “OR” great bodily harm you have the right to self defense. GZ screaming for approx 1 min demonstrates wanting to “stop” the altercation. TM had that entire time to “choose” to stop the altercation. He “chose” to continue and paid for it with his life.
-----------------------
GZ guilty proponents:
1. Following someone is a crime and makes you an aggressor.
Sorry people but that's an "assumption" and legally NOT TRUE...
2. Carrying a loaded gun makes you a vigilante looking 4 trouble.
Sorry people but that's an "assumption" and legally NOT TRUE...
3. John Good (Witness with best view) = LIAR!
4. The two police investigators are both = LIARS!
5. GZ’s MMA instructor/trainer = LIAR!
6. Basically “everyone” who is “for” GZ = LIARS!
7. GZ’s “immediate reaction of “Thank God!” was “pre-planned” because GZ is a “mastermind”…
8. GZ, being a pathetic “fighter” still tried to throw 1st punch. Stretch, at best
9. Won’t accept common sense that your voice sounds diff when you hear it recorded (think of phone answering machine). I’e’ GZ saying “that doesn’t even sound like me”… Mr. Donnelly (combat vet) is actually 100% correct. Yes, he supports GZ but his testimony irt “250lb men sounding like girls when screaming for life” is still absolutely correct...
10. They perceive GZ’s inconsistencies are bigger than they actually are.
11. They refuse to accept what Jeantel’s & Bahadoor’s “combined” testimony indicates (TM “chose” to move “from” left (dad’s fiancées house) “to” the right (altercation site).
12. They ignore the LAW and just say GZ had no right to shoot. I guess GZ should’ve just let TM pound him into a coma?...
13. TM’s family’s testimony is more reliable than GZ’s. Come on, seriously? That’s an extremely “nonsensical” belief…
14. GZ’s wounds are “self inflicted”. Ignoring the facts proving TM was “on top” ground and pounding GZ, MMA style. Oh yea, none of those blows “connected” right?...Good grief.
15. They buy into crazy “Race Baiting”, Demagoguery from the likes of Ali Shahrazad, Chris Mathews, Al Sharpton, Bill Maher, etc.
***There are reasonable “inferences/speculation”, then there are things like believing “Half-Baked” conspiracy theories….***
GZ Not Guilty Defense:
1. GZ Following TM = Not a Crime.
2. GZ Carrying Gun = Not a Crime.
3. Most reliable witness (i.e. closest, with best view) John Good, sees GZ ((screaming for help)) being ground & pounded by TM.
4. Professional Police investigators (trained to perceive deception and catch people in lies) said they “believed” GZ telling truth.
5. MMA “experience” (per instructor) = A “soft” person who didn’t even know how to throw punch.
6. GZ’s statements consistent (with “minor” variations). YES they are minor. Reaching for “or” touching gun creates exact same fear for someone being beaten.
7. GZ's testimony irt him screaming for help was "prior" to even knowing about 911 recording.
8. GZ’s immediate response to the proposition that TM’s phone may have caught the fight was…drum roll… “THANK GOD!!”
9. Jeantel’s testimony puts TM in vicinity of dad’s fiancées house. Then, “after” hearing TM say “he’s behind me”, Jeantel hears sounds of TM moving. This matches up with Bahadoor’s statement of hearing running from left to right (from fiancées house towards altercation site). Then, Jeantel hears TM say “what are you following me for”. Highly indicative that TM ran “towards” altercation site as “the aggressor”…
10. If in fear for your life “OR” great bodily harm you have the right to self defense. GZ screaming for approx 1 min demonstrates wanting to “stop” the altercation. TM had that entire time to “choose” to stop the altercation. He “chose” to continue and paid for it with his life.
-----------------------
GZ guilty proponents:
1. Following someone is a crime and makes you an aggressor.
Sorry people but that's an "assumption" and legally NOT TRUE...
2. Carrying a loaded gun makes you a vigilante looking 4 trouble.
Sorry people but that's an "assumption" and legally NOT TRUE...
3. John Good (Witness with best view) = LIAR!
4. The two police investigators are both = LIARS!
5. GZ’s MMA instructor/trainer = LIAR!
6. Basically “everyone” who is “for” GZ = LIARS!
7. GZ’s “immediate reaction of “Thank God!” was “pre-planned” because GZ is a “mastermind”…
8. GZ, being a pathetic “fighter” still tried to throw 1st punch. Stretch, at best
9. Won’t accept common sense that your voice sounds diff when you hear it recorded (think of phone answering machine). I’e’ GZ saying “that doesn’t even sound like me”… Mr. Donnelly (combat vet) is actually 100% correct. Yes, he supports GZ but his testimony irt “250lb men sounding like girls when screaming for life” is still absolutely correct...
10. They perceive GZ’s inconsistencies are bigger than they actually are.
11. They refuse to accept what Jeantel’s & Bahadoor’s “combined” testimony indicates (TM “chose” to move “from” left (dad’s fiancées house) “to” the right (altercation site).
12. They ignore the LAW and just say GZ had no right to shoot. I guess GZ should’ve just let TM pound him into a coma?...
13. TM’s family’s testimony is more reliable than GZ’s. Come on, seriously? That’s an extremely “nonsensical” belief…
14. GZ’s wounds are “self inflicted”. Ignoring the facts proving TM was “on top” ground and pounding GZ, MMA style. Oh yea, none of those blows “connected” right?...Good grief.
15. They buy into crazy “Race Baiting”, Demagoguery from the likes of Ali Shahrazad, Chris Mathews, Al Sharpton, Bill Maher, etc.
***There are reasonable “inferences/speculation”, then there are things like believing “Half-Baked” conspiracy theories….***
