The recent abduction of Baby Kate has shown the limited ability of our local newspaper of record. Reduced to having its stories either delivered to them by the local officials, with the inherent slant they add, or through the wire services, its journalists have grown lazy and primarily motivated by a desire to not offend the sources of their toothless stories.
To whit, the paper dutifully reports what officials are telling it, and then runs with it, with little analysis or further investigation into what is going on. To do so might make their inside sources upset, and not alert them to news in the future, one may presume.
Do I say this because the paper has accepted two slanderous reports from City Manager John Shay about me in November and March, and went with them without even consulting me? That helps; but just read the local paper since the abduction (http://www.ludingtondailynews.com/ search "kate")and then check out WOOD TVs coverage of the story. :
1) WOODTV from Grand Rapids did a FOIA on the 911 call and printed the results 911 Call Baby Kate
2) That same news organization broke the story about the crucial delays of the Amber Alert by LPD Chief Mark Barnett.
3) Consistently, they have supplied more information, and have not just provided fluff and a bunch of coverage about the school forest searches, which really should have been accomplished a lot quicker than one and a half weeks after Baby Kate went missing if it has any likelihood of being the place she is (which no evidence made public seems to point to). It seems to me more like Chief Barnett and other civic leaders are utilizing that search more to save the image of Ludington in the national spotlight. But maybe that's just my cynical interpretation.
Here is just a sample of more of their (WOOD) news articles; they along with other outlets like Mlive,the Muskegon Chronicle, TV 9&10, local radio, and WZZM have been the ones to turn to for the latest information on this story.
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/nw_mich/Blood-droplets-found-n...
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/nw_mich/Phillips-friend-Doesnt...
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/nw_mich/Kates-alleged-kidnappe...
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/nw_mich/Where-is-Kate-Baby-van...
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/nw_mich/Wendy's-worker%3APhill...
Bland news with no journalistic substance, with only an occasional flair of style that wins them newspaper awards from modern-day journalists more attuned to style without substance. That's what daily passes for newsprint in Ludington.
Tags:
Today's paper is another example. The headline about Baby Kate "Custody Disputes Documented", rely on FOIA requests submitted by another media outlet to tell us that there have been at least seven custody dispute complaints or phone calls made to LPD by the mother and suspected dad/kidnapper.
Up until now, I've been following the news, and this is the first I've heard of this, and this information would have remained hidden to the public by the LPD if only the LDN was following the story. This also makes you wonder why the Amber Alert took so long to be spread by the Chief.
When this story gets further along it will be interesting to find out what else was kept from the public eye when this young lady's life may have been at stake. For that, I'm following other news outlets.
Dave, I thought about that last night before I went to bed (before midnight), to do a FOIA request on the FOIA replies sent to the various news outlets (by the City of Ludington) that have been following the Baby Kate story. Great minds must think alike.
I hear diseased minds also think alike, as well. I'm going to get that out this weekend.
The WOOD article found that the AMBER alert was out, but some agencies did not receive it until many hours later. It could have been something wrong with the process or the incident commander just didn't do it right. The article's interview with Chief Barnett did seem to indicate some problem happened on his end.
http://www.woodtv.com/dpp/news/local/nw_mich/Did-Amber-Alert-suspec...
John, the ladies of the court offices have loose lips, ... and they do sink ships. The inability of the 79th District Court gossipping gals to keep information about the formal hearing on my bicycle-stop sign confidential was first noted by me in The Lawbreakers: Episode 2 thread:
"Before I had even got a notice for my hearing (which arrived ten days later, 21 days after my request), these two LEOs had gotten wind that I was boldly denying the ticket from the 79th District Court. Wanting to not have to go to court, they told my superiors that I needed to drop the case, and exaggerated their story accordingly. The meeting notes I received recently through FOIA, plainly state that Chief Barnett specifically brought it to the fire officer's attention, and all but one figured they had an obligation to address the matter accordingly. That lone dissenter had figure it was a private matter between me and the LPD. He was right."
If these nattering magpies of the court had kept true to their oaths of confidentiality, the saga of XLFD may have never began, and I would be still out fighting fires, and helping in missing-person searches. Hopefully, their part in my story will be brought to public attention when this matter of mine gets set aright.
© 2025 Created by XLFD. Powered by